IS THE DECISION MAKING ABILITY OF THE HUMAN CORRUPTED?
======================================================
An old man walked by a middle aged woman on the street 10mins ago, she was staring at her cell phone and upon passing her on the sidewalk said in a freindly voice "You look just like a teenager". He was in essence paying her a compliment of sorts.
An observation to note:
1. Both parties have accepted these behaviours as normal.
So what is Normal? and what is Acceptance?
Normal or Norm is defined as: A recognized type or a standard.
Acceptance is defined as: Consent to receive something.
So the old man has "acceptance" that teenagers walk around staring at phones is "normal". Therefore the middle aged women is like a teenager to him.
Very curious logic!
===================================================================
We have all been programmed to have "acceptance" for phones. OK, fine, lets agree on this point. We are literally and legally "consenting to receive" the phone and "service" when we connect those devices to a "provider".
Now, take a birds eye view of the overall situation, keeping in mind that having a phone is normal to the general population at large.
So what is the mystique about it all, what are the real phychological effects at work here and how did people decide to accept this and other harmful things in society as normal? Especially the phone acceptance as it is extremely "normal" in todays world.
There are a limited amount of people who would consider a phone "not-normal" or do NOT accept it!
Basically the psychology is a recycled global paradigm that seems to work very well and that is...
ACCEPT THIS, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL. (the word THIS can be replaced with any word you want)
A few familiar examples of this paradigm are listed below:
ACCEPT FAST FOOD, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
ACCEPT DRINKING ALCOHOL, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
ACCEPT DRIVING A CAR, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
ACCEPT LYING POLITICIANS, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
ACCEPT NEWSPAPERS, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
ACCEPT CELL PHONES, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
All examples including the phone have something in common, they require you to pay for them to function and in turn they are unhealthy for your mind, your body and/or your community.
====================================================================
Seemingly the examples when introduced initially were not normal, but once they are exposed over and over to the public they gain acceptance and become normal even if the person does not use the item.
For example:
When cars were invented the average person used a horse and buggy, cars were therefore new and not considered normal. However after many cars were seen people began to accept it, even those who still used the horse and buggy.
Fast forward to today, we know cars pollute the air which affects your mind and body. They also have introduced many other profitable and yet phychologically effective sub services which we all accept are part of driving...
$ Drivers licence
$ Insurance
$ Plates
$ Sticker on Plate
$ Vehicle Safety Certification
$ Emissions Certification
$ Carbon Tax
We won't go into those however, they got introduced, accepted and are now considered normal. You should review the list above and begin to see a sickening trend...
ACCEPT THIS, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
========================================================================
Is there any sane person in the world who could disagree that the car functioning pollutes the air...? So we have accepted paying for something which kills us as normal... amazing right?
This is so normal and accepted that people don't talk about it at all! Therefore, once something becomes normal it can't be considered a relevant problem anymore?
You see, humanity has no problem accepting MORE things that will kill them because they have already accepted the car and many others. Humans are now desensitized to further and more elegantly hurt themselves and those around them who may not accept this defeated mindset.
ACCEPT THIS, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
========================================================================
The main point to stress is you have consented to many things only because they are "normal" NOT because you took time to look at the real facts.
Its clever, when you think of the pollution a car emits, you can see it, you know its in the air. However a phone, has no visible pollution - Other than the polluted cave man like behaviour the human exibits when they engadge with the phone itself.
ACCEPT THIS, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
========================================================================
Pros and Cons of cellphones / devices
1. You bought a phone / device
Pros
- You can communicate
Cons
- $ Cost of device
- $ Monthly payments
2. You use the phone / device
Pros
- You can communicate
Cons
- You are directly holding the device = Many signals / frequencies / bands / radiation
-- Service Provider Band (talk channel)
-- Service Provider Band (data channel)
-- GPS Band
-- WiFi Band
-- Bluetooth Band
-- NFC Band (tap to pay channel)
- EMF = Electromagnetic Radiation aka Microwaves
- Your really not doing anything productive most of the time
- Neglecting people around you constantly
- The provider uses your own data to learn more about your behaviour
- You are making pollution for others around you
Note: Most of the things you do on a device could be scheduled and do not require your valuable attention 24/7. That is without involving the pollution factor.
3. Not using the phone / device (in pocket)
Pros
- You are doing something not requiring the phone temporarily
Cons
- You are still outputing signal pollution and radiation into your body (read device owners manual you will notice the hardware providers warning to keep the devices at least 2cm from your body to avoid potential harmful effects - this is a blanket "legal liability disclaimer")
Note: A cellular phone has similar technology as your home router or modem, would you keep your router or modem in your pocket or stick it against your ear all day long? Really?
4. Not using the phone / device (not near you)
Pros
- You are doing something not requiring the phone temporarily
Cons
- You are still outputing signal pollution and radiation
ACCEPT THIS, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
========================================================================
Humans have been subjected to being normalized, even when they don't accept something they could still consider it "normal".
This has been happening for centuries, so don't blame yourself. Actually using your brain, with practice this becomes normal, use it to think critically and logically. The human allows other factors to determine decisions for them, therefore they do not use the faculties of decision making or thought, this faculty does not know how to function.
If you agree that many "normal" things should not be used because they are simply hurtful to humanity (physically or mentally) then logically you should not support or use them in any way.
Example Scenario 1:
You are invited to view an experiment with a scientist. You enter the labratory and the scientist tells you today test subjects will be given 3 options;
1. Drink Bottle 1
2. Drink Bottle 2
3. Do Nothing
The first subject selects to drink Bottle 1. He dies.
The second subject selects to drink Bottle 2. He becomes ill, and ultimately dies.
The third subject selects to do nothing and no harm comes to him.
The next day you are again invited, however now you will participate in the same experiment:
You are given 3 options;
1. Drink Bottle 1
2. Drink Bottle 2
3. Do Nothing
Since you observed that each bottle did harm to the previous subjects, you make a decision based on those observations to select option 3. All people after having the knowledge of the effects would choose option 3. However, if the subject did not have the knowledge beforehand he would have to take a wild guess or perhaps if time was given, to research what was in the bottle(s), he could determine whether the contents of the bottles were harmful by basic tests before drinking the contents.
Humans have the faculty of decision making. If we or someone else inflicts us with harm physically or mentally and we can see or sense that this is harming us, we make the decision to stop or gain distance from that harmful behaviour.
If we or someone else inflicts us with an invisible harm that has no noticible immediate physical or mental side effects, we decide that this is not harmful because we cannot see any effect.
We did not personally do any rational testing on the invisible harm nor did we attempt to gauge the potential harm by observing results from testing on other subjects in the field. We simple accepted the invisible harm as non-existant because the general population considers it normal.
The sound human mind does not want to harm itself. Therefore, someone who harms himself should be considered of an unsound mind. Or if the person considers themselves of a sound mind and is harming themselves, we can assume that the mind and decision making faculties have been corrupted.
ACCEPT THIS, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
========================================================================
-End
*pre-edit (no spelling/grammar check)
========================================================================
Further questions:
-Is this corruption a result or partial result of invisible signals?
-Is this corruption a result of past events in history?
-Is it possible to communicate effectively without a cellular phone/device?
-How to measure all output signals from a cellular device?
-What are the visible effects on human behaviour from extended use on devices?
-Are the results on human behaviour from use of phones/devices a fluke or strategic? For what purpose(s)? Who benefits? Who suffers?
-Can the average human stop using a phone/device for 1 week for the purpose of measuring thier own habitual dependance/addiction and thereby make a decision whether they consider themselves inflicted with harm or not. Afterwards they can modify the way they communicate or continue if results prove they are not inflicted.
======================================================
An old man walked by a middle aged woman on the street 10mins ago, she was staring at her cell phone and upon passing her on the sidewalk said in a freindly voice "You look just like a teenager". He was in essence paying her a compliment of sorts.
An observation to note:
1. Both parties have accepted these behaviours as normal.
So what is Normal? and what is Acceptance?
Normal or Norm is defined as: A recognized type or a standard.
Acceptance is defined as: Consent to receive something.
So the old man has "acceptance" that teenagers walk around staring at phones is "normal". Therefore the middle aged women is like a teenager to him.
Very curious logic!
===================================================================
We have all been programmed to have "acceptance" for phones. OK, fine, lets agree on this point. We are literally and legally "consenting to receive" the phone and "service" when we connect those devices to a "provider".
Now, take a birds eye view of the overall situation, keeping in mind that having a phone is normal to the general population at large.
So what is the mystique about it all, what are the real phychological effects at work here and how did people decide to accept this and other harmful things in society as normal? Especially the phone acceptance as it is extremely "normal" in todays world.
There are a limited amount of people who would consider a phone "not-normal" or do NOT accept it!
Basically the psychology is a recycled global paradigm that seems to work very well and that is...
ACCEPT THIS, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL. (the word THIS can be replaced with any word you want)
A few familiar examples of this paradigm are listed below:
ACCEPT FAST FOOD, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
ACCEPT DRINKING ALCOHOL, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
ACCEPT DRIVING A CAR, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
ACCEPT LYING POLITICIANS, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
ACCEPT NEWSPAPERS, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
ACCEPT CELL PHONES, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
All examples including the phone have something in common, they require you to pay for them to function and in turn they are unhealthy for your mind, your body and/or your community.
====================================================================
Seemingly the examples when introduced initially were not normal, but once they are exposed over and over to the public they gain acceptance and become normal even if the person does not use the item.
For example:
When cars were invented the average person used a horse and buggy, cars were therefore new and not considered normal. However after many cars were seen people began to accept it, even those who still used the horse and buggy.
Fast forward to today, we know cars pollute the air which affects your mind and body. They also have introduced many other profitable and yet phychologically effective sub services which we all accept are part of driving...
$ Drivers licence
$ Insurance
$ Plates
$ Sticker on Plate
$ Vehicle Safety Certification
$ Emissions Certification
$ Carbon Tax
We won't go into those however, they got introduced, accepted and are now considered normal. You should review the list above and begin to see a sickening trend...
ACCEPT THIS, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
========================================================================
Is there any sane person in the world who could disagree that the car functioning pollutes the air...? So we have accepted paying for something which kills us as normal... amazing right?
This is so normal and accepted that people don't talk about it at all! Therefore, once something becomes normal it can't be considered a relevant problem anymore?
You see, humanity has no problem accepting MORE things that will kill them because they have already accepted the car and many others. Humans are now desensitized to further and more elegantly hurt themselves and those around them who may not accept this defeated mindset.
ACCEPT THIS, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
========================================================================
The main point to stress is you have consented to many things only because they are "normal" NOT because you took time to look at the real facts.
Its clever, when you think of the pollution a car emits, you can see it, you know its in the air. However a phone, has no visible pollution - Other than the polluted cave man like behaviour the human exibits when they engadge with the phone itself.
ACCEPT THIS, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
========================================================================
Pros and Cons of cellphones / devices
1. You bought a phone / device
Pros
- You can communicate
Cons
- $ Cost of device
- $ Monthly payments
2. You use the phone / device
Pros
- You can communicate
Cons
- You are directly holding the device = Many signals / frequencies / bands / radiation
-- Service Provider Band (talk channel)
-- Service Provider Band (data channel)
-- GPS Band
-- WiFi Band
-- Bluetooth Band
-- NFC Band (tap to pay channel)
- EMF = Electromagnetic Radiation aka Microwaves
- Your really not doing anything productive most of the time
- Neglecting people around you constantly
- The provider uses your own data to learn more about your behaviour
- You are making pollution for others around you
Note: Most of the things you do on a device could be scheduled and do not require your valuable attention 24/7. That is without involving the pollution factor.
3. Not using the phone / device (in pocket)
Pros
- You are doing something not requiring the phone temporarily
Cons
- You are still outputing signal pollution and radiation into your body (read device owners manual you will notice the hardware providers warning to keep the devices at least 2cm from your body to avoid potential harmful effects - this is a blanket "legal liability disclaimer")
Note: A cellular phone has similar technology as your home router or modem, would you keep your router or modem in your pocket or stick it against your ear all day long? Really?
4. Not using the phone / device (not near you)
Pros
- You are doing something not requiring the phone temporarily
Cons
- You are still outputing signal pollution and radiation
ACCEPT THIS, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
========================================================================
Humans have been subjected to being normalized, even when they don't accept something they could still consider it "normal".
This has been happening for centuries, so don't blame yourself. Actually using your brain, with practice this becomes normal, use it to think critically and logically. The human allows other factors to determine decisions for them, therefore they do not use the faculties of decision making or thought, this faculty does not know how to function.
If you agree that many "normal" things should not be used because they are simply hurtful to humanity (physically or mentally) then logically you should not support or use them in any way.
Example Scenario 1:
You are invited to view an experiment with a scientist. You enter the labratory and the scientist tells you today test subjects will be given 3 options;
1. Drink Bottle 1
2. Drink Bottle 2
3. Do Nothing
The first subject selects to drink Bottle 1. He dies.
The second subject selects to drink Bottle 2. He becomes ill, and ultimately dies.
The third subject selects to do nothing and no harm comes to him.
The next day you are again invited, however now you will participate in the same experiment:
You are given 3 options;
1. Drink Bottle 1
2. Drink Bottle 2
3. Do Nothing
Since you observed that each bottle did harm to the previous subjects, you make a decision based on those observations to select option 3. All people after having the knowledge of the effects would choose option 3. However, if the subject did not have the knowledge beforehand he would have to take a wild guess or perhaps if time was given, to research what was in the bottle(s), he could determine whether the contents of the bottles were harmful by basic tests before drinking the contents.
Humans have the faculty of decision making. If we or someone else inflicts us with harm physically or mentally and we can see or sense that this is harming us, we make the decision to stop or gain distance from that harmful behaviour.
If we or someone else inflicts us with an invisible harm that has no noticible immediate physical or mental side effects, we decide that this is not harmful because we cannot see any effect.
We did not personally do any rational testing on the invisible harm nor did we attempt to gauge the potential harm by observing results from testing on other subjects in the field. We simple accepted the invisible harm as non-existant because the general population considers it normal.
The sound human mind does not want to harm itself. Therefore, someone who harms himself should be considered of an unsound mind. Or if the person considers themselves of a sound mind and is harming themselves, we can assume that the mind and decision making faculties have been corrupted.
ACCEPT THIS, EVERYONE ELSE DOES, ITS NORMAL.
========================================================================
-End
*pre-edit (no spelling/grammar check)
========================================================================
Further questions:
-Is this corruption a result or partial result of invisible signals?
-Is this corruption a result of past events in history?
-Is it possible to communicate effectively without a cellular phone/device?
-How to measure all output signals from a cellular device?
-What are the visible effects on human behaviour from extended use on devices?
-Are the results on human behaviour from use of phones/devices a fluke or strategic? For what purpose(s)? Who benefits? Who suffers?
-Can the average human stop using a phone/device for 1 week for the purpose of measuring thier own habitual dependance/addiction and thereby make a decision whether they consider themselves inflicted with harm or not. Afterwards they can modify the way they communicate or continue if results prove they are not inflicted.
Comments
Post a Comment
Leave a comment here